Restoration of St. Annamorphosis







Leonardo's painting: The Virgin and Child with St. Anne. Underwent restoration in 2011-2012 which resulted in a controversy causing  two of the advisory committee supervisors to resign. Critics said that it was damaged by the restoration and became too bright. Others thought it came out fine. You can judge for yourself above. The darker is the pre-restoration.

I tried to make gifs showing the difference by transitioning between the two -  but the pictures of the before and after must have been taken from a different perspective so they would not align (over each other) properly. If they would have been taken from the same spot they would fit right over each other. Ironically Leonardo talks about this same thing in  his notebooks and designed his paintings to be viewed from a specific vantage point. It's also the basis for anamorphosis - which is art that changes depending on your perspective. oh, Leonardo was also the first artist known to use it!








I didn't realize until today who 'St. Anne' actually was. It's Jesus's grandma. Although it doesn't name her in the bible but comes from 'New testament Apocrypha' which are like 'fan fiction' that May or may not be true. -shrug-
This is how St. Anne and the Virgin Mary were depicted before being "Europeanized" 
Anyways another thing interesting about this particular drapery study -sketch is that it is the area of the actual painting that Freud thought Leonardo subconsciously' painted the outline of a Vulture. (When viewed sideways)


The vulture was supposed to represent his 'mother' because a vulture represents his 'mothers nipple' and is also represented in Egyptian hieroglyphs (as being mothers)..
It seems that I was always destined to be so deeply concerned with vultures—for I recall as one of my very earliest memories that while I was in my cradle a vulture came down to me, and opened my mouth with its tail, and struck me many times with its tail against my lips.
Ultimately the translation of the Italian word 'Nibbo' Leo used was not vulture but Kite - which is an entirely different type of bird, making Freud's interpretation wrong. This was unfortunate for Freud since he later confessed after realizing his error that his article about it was, in his opinion, "the only thing I have ever written."

Leonardo's account of his first memory is still intriguing since it's unlikely that is he referring to an actual bird's tail poking his lips.

Even though the translation was wrong about it being a vulture it does not mean that Leonardo did not include the shape of a bird in this painting or that it has anything to do with his first memory. 
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

1.2.1 - Shone

Mohenjo Daro

Nothing's real until you let go completely.